Difference between revisions of "Talk:Raymond"
m (Undo revision 774410 by ExpertNoob1019 (talk). Unconstructive discussion.) Tag: Undo |
Charmander7 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Either way, it seems to be addressed in a way that I think is appropriate in the preamble of the article [[Special:Contributions/2601:602:8500:3DD0:E1FD:E411:EEA5:5DF7|2601:602:8500:3DD0:E1FD:E411:EEA5:5DF7]] 19:07, May 12, 2020 (EDT) | Either way, it seems to be addressed in a way that I think is appropriate in the preamble of the article [[Special:Contributions/2601:602:8500:3DD0:E1FD:E411:EEA5:5DF7|2601:602:8500:3DD0:E1FD:E411:EEA5:5DF7]] 19:07, May 12, 2020 (EDT) | ||
| + | I think we should add something about the fact that he sometimes will be sold ungifted for real-world money, which, corret me if I'm wrong, is actually illegal. Maybe a controversy or trivia section could include this information. ~[[File:SylveonSig.png|link=User:Sylveon|120px]] 08:47, April 11, 2023 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:47, April 11, 2023
Fitting Reference
Everybody Loves Raymond. He is best cat. He IS best cat. Should we mention how seemingly loved by the fandom he is? SplatNerdBekahboo (Talk) 10:02, April 9, 2020 (EDT)
I personally do not think we should add any mentions to his popularity without cold, hard facts backing it up. Even pages like Bob or Rosie do not reference popularity except their placements on a Japanese popularity poll. Lampshade59276 (talk)
Either way, it seems to be addressed in a way that I think is appropriate in the preamble of the article 2601:602:8500:3DD0:E1FD:E411:EEA5:5DF7 19:07, May 12, 2020 (EDT)
I think we should add something about the fact that he sometimes will be sold ungifted for real-world money, which, corret me if I'm wrong, is actually illegal. Maybe a controversy or trivia section could include this information. ~
08:47, April 11, 2023 (EDT)
