User talk:50.136.149.237

Please stop adding the Sailor Venus speculation to the Mira page - you and other users have a history of doing this. There is a clear consensus that there is no clear relation between Mira and Sailor Venus. If you re-add it again the semi-protection will return, possibly indefinitely. Thank you for reading, and keep contributing. 06:15, December 19, 2014 (EST)

Page Blanking
Blanking talk pages is not allowed. Please contribute constructively instead of messing with those. 13:11, December 19, 2014 (EST)

RE:Look below
Not especially, although Octavian in the is pretty cool. :) 13:19, December 19, 2014 (EST)

Talk Page Message Removal
Hey there, I reverted your last removal of Red's message. I'm afraid that removing messages from talk pages is against the wiki's policy in most cases, including this one; in the last year especially, the policy has shifted more toward keeping all past talk page records. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Incidentally, you could create an account on the wiki to use for editing, if you haven't already, which would allow you to leave this talk page behind, more or less. -Sky (talk)   01:23, December 20, 2014 (EST)

Protection Notice
Because you keep blanking this talk page, it is now semi-protected for a week, so you'll need to reply on my or other staff member's talk page if you have any questions or whatnot. Thank you. 06:50, December 20, 2014 (EST)

g
If IPs aren't supposed to have user pages, why is it possible for one(including me) to make one? --50.136.149.237 20:50, December 30, 2014 (EST)
 * Just because you can technically create it; IPs can create pages for some reason (but not talk pages, on many other wikis it's the other way around). But by no means does that mean it's allowed, we just have to trust users to not create such pages, and it's not like it's a big hassle to delete an IP userpage when one is created. This reminds me a bit of the message in the user talk archive template that states that only admins can edit this archive, but it's technically possible for anyone to edit it (the software can't recognize archives) so protection is often needed in these cases. 11:42, December 31, 2014 (EST)

Why can't anonymous users create talk pages? Is there a way for administrators to change this kind of stuff in settings that can only be changed by admins? I'm not an admin so I don't know if there is....

--50.136.149.237 20:11, January 1, 2015 (EST)


 * Only the server admin has access to these kind of settings. 06:51, January 2, 2015 (EST)

Is there a picture of what the settings look like? I want to know what it looks and I'm so curious about this! --50.136.149.237 12:52, January 2, 2015 (EST)
 * There aren't any "settings" to screenshot. All of the permissions are programmed in using PHP coding. If you want to see a list of all of the permissions by user group, check out Special:ListGroupRights. -- Ja ke  14:06, January 2, 2015 (EST)

Are you going to change the settings? It kinda bothers me how I can't create talk pages(i also can create a user page, but that doesn't bother me). I wish I could create talk pages of villagers(and stuff like that) that don't have a talk page created. I don't want to create an account because i want to be anonymous. You don't have to actually do it, I can live without and i'm just saying. --50.136.149.237 16:41, January 4, 2015 (EST)
 * I do support the idea of IP's being able to create talk pages, if that can be implemented. That being said, you can create an account while still remaining anonymous. There's no requirement for you to use a real name or disclose any personal information. If anything, an account can be more anonymous than editing via IP, as an IP address reveals your general location. ~Super Hamster  Talk 18:03, January 4, 2015 (EST)

What i meant by anonymous is not creating an account. I want to be an unregistered anon even if it can be shared by other users. --50.136.149.237 16:28, January 6, 2015 (EST)

Since you want to create talk pages for certain subjects, what kinds of questions and comments do you have in mind pertaining to these articles? I guess asking people like me or other users now would be the best way to accomplish what you want to do if you insist on remaining anonymous. On another note, I'm not sure why I.P.s can even create pages in the first place since deleting pages require certain group rights in the first place. 17:18, January 6, 2015 (EST)
 * P.S. I'm a bit late, but "erection" has a completely nonsexual meaning; it means "mounting, to put up". You do this to flags, poles, towers, and anything.
 * P.P.S. Considering your recent disruptive and untrustworthy behavior regarding spam and vandalism, my question is if giving I.P.s the right to create talk pages is even worth it. 17:36, January 6, 2015 (EST)

What SuperHamster and I are trying to communicate is that you are actually more anonymous by creating an account. If you have an account, only high ranking staff members can view details such as your IP, City/State, and computer information. But if you do not create an account, your IP will remain public and anyone can view it or use it to trace your location. A quick Google search of your IP reveals several other wikis you are (or were) active on, each of which you appear to be known for making disruptive edits on. My point is, you aren't as anonymous as you think by remaining unregistered. We do not intend on changing our permissions to allow IPs to create talk pages any time soon because on average, and as demonstrated, registered users tend to hold themselves more accountable for their edits than IPs do. -- Ja ke  22:13, January 6, 2015 (EST)

But if you search up "erection", you'll mostly find results about the sexual meaning of the word. --50.136.149.237 15:54, January 8, 2015 (EST)

I'll let this go for now (between you and me, edit-warring with you about something as trivial as this would make my Administrator application look bad) but if you continue to revert admin edits, one of the higher-ups will block you again. 13:47, January 9, 2015 (EST)
 * Reverting admin's edits isn't bad per se, but continuously reverting our edits qualifies as edit warring, which isn't desirable behavior for either user. Red Snapper, however, has already established himself as a trustworthy user. We've said before, you have a bad record and you're not making much better improvements despite some good edits you've made. At this rate, you can face another block, even longer if this keeps up. 18:29, January 11, 2015 (EST)

Net / Toy Hammer
We'll get an answer on the capitalization policies eventually, but in the meantime, you need to follow them and not edit war if you want to keep your editing privileges. Thank you! 15:30, January 14, 2015 (EST)


 * Regarding this, I have blocked you (50.136.149.237) for 24 hours for editing against policy and counter-productive edit warring. Our policy is there to set out standards that the community has agreed upon - if you disagree with it, you are more than welcome to initiate a discussion on it (either at the Community Fountain or the Bulletin Board), but you should not edit content against policy or continue to edit war as Red has explained. Edit warring is counter-productive, compared to discussions. ~Super Hamster  Talk 19:26, January 14, 2015 (EST)