Difference between revisions of "Nookipedia talk:Project Images"

From Nookipedia, the Animal Crossing wiki
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== AC or PG ==
 
== AC or PG ==
 
 
There's one problem here. It should may titled PG (for Population Growing) instead of AC, because AC may referenced as the series. [[User:Vmario97|Vmario97]] ([[User talk:Vmario97|talk]]) 01:52, May 4, 2018 (EDT)
 
There's one problem here. It should may titled PG (for Population Growing) instead of AC, because AC may referenced as the series. [[User:Vmario97|Vmario97]] ([[User talk:Vmario97|talk]]) 01:52, May 4, 2018 (EDT)
  
 
Oh, that makes sense. I shall change the rules based on this. Thanks for telling me. --[[User:LoneShadowStar|LoneShadowStar]] ([[User talk:LoneShadowStar|talk]]) 10:21, May 4, 2018 (EDT)
 
Oh, that makes sense. I shall change the rules based on this. Thanks for telling me. --[[User:LoneShadowStar|LoneShadowStar]] ([[User talk:LoneShadowStar|talk]]) 10:21, May 4, 2018 (EDT)
 
  
 
== Naming conventions ==
 
== Naming conventions ==
 
I wanted to first say thank you to [[User:LoneShadowStar|LoneShadowStar]] for creating this project, I think it's definitely past due. That said, I do have a few questions about the proposed naming conventions. My first question is why the convention for villagers is VillagerName(space)GameAbbreviation.png (e.g. Bob NL.png) whereas all other files start with the game title: GameAbbreviationVillagerNamePitfall all with no spaces. Is it because most of the villager files were already of the format VillagerName(space)GameAbbreviation.png? It would seem to me that for consistency there either should or shouldn't be spaces, and the game abbreviation either should or shouldn't be first (or last). Also we should formally name all of the game abbreviations we plan to use. (e.g. PG, WW etc.) We should also list here all of the categories we plan to use in a list format so it's easy to understand/find them all. Linking to properly categorized example images would also be helpful. I'm not sure if this project's leader will reply here, so I'd like to open this topic up to discussion. [[File:Sunmarshsignature.png|link=User:Sunmarsh]] '''<small><span style="font-variant:small-caps">([[User_talk:Sunmarsh|<span style="color:#7B7B7B">talk</span>]])</span></small>''' 19:46, November 21, 2019 (EST)
 
I wanted to first say thank you to [[User:LoneShadowStar|LoneShadowStar]] for creating this project, I think it's definitely past due. That said, I do have a few questions about the proposed naming conventions. My first question is why the convention for villagers is VillagerName(space)GameAbbreviation.png (e.g. Bob NL.png) whereas all other files start with the game title: GameAbbreviationVillagerNamePitfall all with no spaces. Is it because most of the villager files were already of the format VillagerName(space)GameAbbreviation.png? It would seem to me that for consistency there either should or shouldn't be spaces, and the game abbreviation either should or shouldn't be first (or last). Also we should formally name all of the game abbreviations we plan to use. (e.g. PG, WW etc.) We should also list here all of the categories we plan to use in a list format so it's easy to understand/find them all. Linking to properly categorized example images would also be helpful. I'm not sure if this project's leader will reply here, so I'd like to open this topic up to discussion. [[File:Sunmarshsignature.png|link=User:Sunmarsh]] '''<small><span style="font-variant:small-caps">([[User_talk:Sunmarsh|<span style="color:#7B7B7B">talk</span>]])</span></small>''' 19:46, November 21, 2019 (EST)
  
[[Category:Active Discussions]]
+
== Image Quality Templates ==
 +
I am starting this discussion to gather opinions on whether or not the {{t|Image-quality}} template should be split into separate templates like [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Image_quality_templates Wikipedia] does. These separate templates would specify what exactly the problem is with a particular image, along with how to go about fixing it. Examples of what I mean can be seen [[User:AlexBot2004/Sandbox 3|here]]. Please comment leaving your opinion and vote {{Support}} or {{Oppose}} below. '''~'''  [[User:AlexBot2004|<span style="color:#1C662A">'''AlexBot2004'''</span>]] ([[User talk:AlexBot2004|<span style="color:black">Talk</span>]]) 22:23, May 17, 2020 (EDT)
  
== Image Quality Templates ==
+
===Oppose===
 +
:{{Oppose}} Trig Jegman  - 22:50, May 17, 2020 (EDT)
 +
:I don't see a need to further split image quality any more than it already is. [[Nookipedia:Image Requests]] is not that full--relatively speaking--especially compared to other same size wikis that rely on only 1 organization for low quality images. To further split into categories simply makes it more difficult to find images to replace. Image quality is as straight-forward as it gets. An image is of low quality and needs improvement. No one is going to have their doubts about why [[:File:DKJ.jpg]] is of a low quality, and this likely applies to most other images. If there is a possibility of doubt or even as a fail same, Image-quality can use the reason parameter to describe in much more specific detail as to WHY an image needs recapture or reuploaded than multiple categories can.
  
I am starting this discussion to gather opinions on whether or not the {{t|Image-quality}} template should be split into separate templates like [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Image_quality_templates Wikipedia] does. These separate templates would specify what exactly the problem is with a particular image, along with how to go about fixing it. Examples of what I mean can be seen [[User:AlexBot2004/Sandbox 3|here]]. Please comment leaving your opinion and vote {{Support}} or {{Oppose}} below. '''~'''  [[User:AlexBot2004|<span style="color:#1C662A">'''AlexBot2004'''</span>]] ([[User talk:AlexBot2004|<span style="color:black">Talk</span>]]) 22:23, May 17, 2020 (EDT)
+
[[Category:Active Discussions]]

Revision as of 22:50, May 17, 2020

AC or PG

There's one problem here. It should may titled PG (for Population Growing) instead of AC, because AC may referenced as the series. Vmario97 (talk) 01:52, May 4, 2018 (EDT)

Oh, that makes sense. I shall change the rules based on this. Thanks for telling me. --LoneShadowStar (talk) 10:21, May 4, 2018 (EDT)

Naming conventions

I wanted to first say thank you to LoneShadowStar for creating this project, I think it's definitely past due. That said, I do have a few questions about the proposed naming conventions. My first question is why the convention for villagers is VillagerName(space)GameAbbreviation.png (e.g. Bob NL.png) whereas all other files start with the game title: GameAbbreviationVillagerNamePitfall all with no spaces. Is it because most of the villager files were already of the format VillagerName(space)GameAbbreviation.png? It would seem to me that for consistency there either should or shouldn't be spaces, and the game abbreviation either should or shouldn't be first (or last). Also we should formally name all of the game abbreviations we plan to use. (e.g. PG, WW etc.) We should also list here all of the categories we plan to use in a list format so it's easy to understand/find them all. Linking to properly categorized example images would also be helpful. I'm not sure if this project's leader will reply here, so I'd like to open this topic up to discussion. Sunmarshsignature.png (talk) 19:46, November 21, 2019 (EST)

Image Quality Templates

I am starting this discussion to gather opinions on whether or not the {{Image-quality}} template should be split into separate templates like Wikipedia does. These separate templates would specify what exactly the problem is with a particular image, along with how to go about fixing it. Examples of what I mean can be seen here. Please comment leaving your opinion and vote Support Support or Oppose Oppose below. ~ AlexBot2004 (Talk) 22:23, May 17, 2020 (EDT)

Oppose

Oppose Oppose Trig Jegman - 22:50, May 17, 2020 (EDT)
I don't see a need to further split image quality any more than it already is. Nookipedia:Image Requests is not that full--relatively speaking--especially compared to other same size wikis that rely on only 1 organization for low quality images. To further split into categories simply makes it more difficult to find images to replace. Image quality is as straight-forward as it gets. An image is of low quality and needs improvement. No one is going to have their doubts about why File:DKJ.jpg is of a low quality, and this likely applies to most other images. If there is a possibility of doubt or even as a fail same, Image-quality can use the reason parameter to describe in much more specific detail as to WHY an image needs recapture or reuploaded than multiple categories can.