Talk:Look

Bunny look

On my game, I was buying the Fluffy shirt and Mabel said that if I get matching accessories, I'd have the bunny look. I don't know, maybe it's a glitch but that's what it said. --Wii maniac 20:11, 12 March 2011 (EST)

I am not sure, but I know there is a bunny shirt in City Folk. Do you have the European copy? It could be a regional difference. Super ^(duh...)Alpaca 20:22, 12 March 2011 (EST)

No, I have the American version. And the Bunny shirt is in the game, but it said that the Fluffy shirt is an accessory in the Bunny look.Wii maniac 22:34, 12 March 2011 (EST)

Okay, so then the bunny shirt should not be listed on the page. Super ^(duh...)Alpaca 14:31, 13 March 2011 (EDT)

Why the separate pages for individual looks?

Do we really need those? Articles such as Grape Look, Chief Look, Red Hero Look are redundant with this article, and thus, should be either deleted or moved to this article. Plus, the links to each look are inconsistent, which looks just sloppy. I say we delete. Mario^{Talk to-a me!} 18:13, September 21, 2013 (EDT)

Agreed, it would be easier to navigate if we had corresponding galleries than separate articles. What's to say in the separate articles anyway other than the appearance and if its sporty, formal, rustic, etc. or not? -Baby Luigi(Talk to me?) 19:06, September 21, 2013 (EDT)

We have to list the price of each item and where they can be found, though, but this article can easily put that information as well. Mario^{Talk to-a me!} 19:43, September 21, 2013 (EDT)

Effects on New Leaf? Also sources?

I tried the Explorer's Look (shirt and hat) and Magical Look (hat and robe) in New Leaf, and Gracie did not give me a discount. This leads to the following question: aside from maybe Mabel and Labelle commenting on it in Able Sisters (e.g., "If you'd like to have a complete pink superheroine outfit, then this is a must-have item!"), how relevant is the "look" in New Leaf?

In addition, it looks like this page is copied from its parent from the Animal Crossing Wikia by User:AnimalCrossingFan12, which, according to their Talk page, lists the source as this page, which is down. A snapshot is available, but isn't helpful either. Also, all looks except the regal and viking looks have no bottoms. This page requires a lot of verification. Decomposer (talk) 06:13, January 3, 2019 (EST)

I can answer some of these questions. The Gracie discount was City Folk only; that feature didn't make it to New Leaf. There's no benefits to a look for Halloween or Festivale either (in NL), so unless I've forgotten something, you're probably right about looks being irrelevant in New Leaf. As for your other questions, I just think that no-one has made the effort to update the article for New Leaf. And, if we rewrote the lead and first few paragraphs, it would eliminate any copyright concenrns. Drago (talk) 10:47, January 3, 2019 (EST)

Time's up for the individual look pages

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

---

Following the excellent revamp by Decomposer (talk | contribs | logs), I feel that we have no use for the individual look pages anymore. They are very short and don't give any useful info that isn't covered elsewhere. See also this discussion and this discussion. So, shall we delete them all? Drago (talk) 07:36, January 8, 2019 (EST)

I definitely  Support the decision to remove the individual look pages, there wasn't really much we could have done with them and no matter how you would have went about it, they would have ended up still being stubs. ~PoizonMushro0m 14:16, January 8, 2019 (EST)

I  Support removing the individual looks pages. There really isn't a need for them and compiling them onto one page will make it easier to access them all in one spot. This can also free up some wiki space. KyleWithStyle 20:07, January 8, 2019 (EST)

Definitely  Support this as well. The following is a list I compiled that may be done for. Comment whether there should be pages to be added or removed from the list:

• Fruit looks Grape Look and Strawberry Look
• Superhero looks Blue Hero Look, Green Hero Look, Heroine Look (with redirect page Pink Superheroine Look), and Red Hero Look
• Astronaut Look, Wrestler Look, Chief Look, Egyptian Look (with redirect pages King Tut Mask and King Tut Wig), and Regal Look (with redirect pages Crown, Royal Crown, and Royal crown)
• Zap Helmets (with redirect Zap helmets) and Zap Suits (with redirect Zap suits)
• File:Grape.jpg, since File:GrapeLook.jpg is a better alternative.
• File:Royal crown.jpg and File:Royal crown price.JPG (for me there is no reason to keep them, unless if someone argues otherwise)

Using Special:WhatLinksHere, it is shown that there should be no dead links outside of the individual pages themselves and this Talk page. Also does anyone know why Bathrobe was "part" of the Ninja Look, or is that just a trap street inherited from the Wikia? Decomposer (talk) 23:23, January 8, 2019 (EST)

I agree with everything listed here. Category:Looks should also be taken out while at it. Senor Mexicano (talk) 01:31, January 9, 2019 (EST)

Wow, I can't believe these were kept up for this long. That's just insane. Definite  Support from me. Senor Mexicano (talk) 01:31, January 9, 2019 (EST)

All done! I've redirected the individual look pages to the main Look article and removed some of the other stuff. Nice that we had such a quick consensus! (BTW, thanks for the list you complied, Decomposer, was helpful! Although, you did miss a couple things. But thanks anyway!) Drago (talk) 11:42, January 9, 2019 (EST)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.