Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hacked villager"
From Nookipedia, the Animal Crossing wiki
PanchamBro (talk | contribs) (closing discussion as page merge has already been done.) |
PanchamBro (talk | contribs) m (Protected "Talk:Hacked villager": Archive page ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 21:58, September 6, 2021
This talk page is an archive.
Only Administrators may edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to The Roost.
This talk page is an archive.
Only Administrators may edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to The Roost.
If this article is valid, would it be a better idea to merge this with Villager modifier? 
™ 17:26, July 21, 2014 (EDT)
Merging?
Weirdly enough, the merger has already been fulfilled. Closing discussion regardless, as there is support to merge the pages. -- PanchamBro (talk • contributions) 21:57, September 6, 2021 (EDT)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
I propose merging this article with Hacking, since it's very short and in my opinion, I don't find it that much necessary for that to have a separate page about hacked villagers. Maybe the same can apply to Villager modifier. Or maybe, Hacked villager and Villager modifier could be merged at last into one article like it was already proposed. ー🌠SEISHI★(talk • contributions) 08:14, July 31, 2021 (EDT)
- I
Support merging both Hacked villager and Villager modifier into Hacking. None of them are long articles so could easily all fit into one. Drago (talk) 
10:25, July 31, 2021 (EDT)
- Support - Agreed. As of right now there isn't enough information to warrant them being on their own pages. I'd be open to moving them back to their own page if and when they are more fleshed out.
(talk) 12:33, July 31, 2021 (EDT) - Support per proposal. -- PanchamBro (talk • contributions) 16:06, August 21, 2021 (EDT)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
