Nookipedia:Staff/Apply/Archives/1

This page is an archive.

Only Administrators may edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

This page is an archive.

Only Administrators may edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

These are the archives for staff promotion applications.

2015

July

HomerJC (talk | contribs | logs) for Any higher than autoconfirmed Edited the wiki 23 times.

Result: Unsuccessful (Withdrawn by nominator) ™ 17:39, July 27, 2015 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by a bureaucrat after seven days.

Nomination: I'm a very good Nookipedian and I am super active. Like WAY active. - HomerJC 22:18, July 26, 2015 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here. Patroller is lowest rank of staff? - HomerJC 23:10, July 26, 2015 (EDT) Yep. ~SuperHamster Talk 01:01, July 27, 2015 (EDT) Error in edit count, I have made more than 150 edits. - HomerJC 23:10, July 26, 2015 (EDT) Yes and no - you've made more than 150 edits, but the application's edit counter only counts article edits. ~SuperHamster Talk 01:01, July 27, 2015 (EDT) Thanks for applying - but realize that staff members are required to be experienced editors, which typically means at least several months of experiences and several hundred edits. I recommend trying again in a few months, once you've gained more experience and know the ins-and-outs of editing. You can always ask me or another of the staff members if they think you're ready in the future. ~SuperHamster Talk 01:03, July 27, 2015 (EDT) Granted, I agree that you are very active, and we do need more Patrollers, so thanks for applying! But, you've only made 9 mainspace edits (at the time of writing), which proves you're not experienced enough to be part of our staff yet (in fact, you're still not even a Trustee). Alright, so you have plenty of edits in other namespaces, but some of those were unconstructive, and you've already been warned about creating inappropriate pages. My sincere apologies, but if I had to choose our next Patroller, shame and heartache, it would not be you (at least not presently). Thanks for reading and keep contributing! Red (talk) 07:02, July 27, 2015 (EDT) We do appreciate more editors in the meantime, but I can't say you have established yourself as a dependable, trustworthy, and mature user yet. Most of your edits have been in userspace, for instance. While it is fun to mess around with userboxes and your userpage, you need more experience by providing valid and meaningful contributions to our mainpages and by participating in discussions relevant to improving the wiki. As for being active, you're frequently here, but I'd like to see how the longer term activity fares before I make the judgement. Finally, being a patroller is more tools and a greater responsibility and presence in this wiki, so I doubt it's really worth it unless you are seriously dedicated to improving the wiki. ™ 17:39, July 27, 2015 (EDT)

Staff Votes Each staff member may vote with Neutral, Weak Support, Support, Strong Support, Weak Oppose, Oppose, or Strong Oppose. Comments (especially for opposition) are encouraged in the comments section. User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral

June

SuperCofee (talk | contribs | logs) for Any higher than autoconfirmed Edited the wiki 14 times.

Result: Unsuccessful (Vetoed; has shown no significant improvement since the last application.) ™ 16:04, June 11, 2015 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by a bureaucrat after seven days.

Nomination: I think im ready now,and i think you shoud add me to staff.(and btw im good at making paper boats but it dosent matter) SᴜᴘᴇʀCᴏғᴇᴇ(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk)

Comments Any editor may provide input here. You haven't shown any noticeable improvement compared to the last time you applied for staff. You need to show more commitment and effort dedicated to improving Nookipedia, outlined in our previous reasons for canceling your application, and we will reconsider. ™ 22:13, June 10, 2015 (EDT) Haha, not this again! The lowest rank above autoconfirmed is trustee (which is not a staff rank), but only very constructive editors get that, so you need to get cracking with article editing. I support another quick veto. Please wait a few months before posting another application, and we may reconsider then. I look forward to seeing you around! Red (talk) 15:03, June 11, 2015 (EDT)

Staff Votes Each staff member may vote with Neutral, Weak Support, Support, Strong Support, Weak Oppose, Oppose, or Strong Oppose. Comments (especially for opposition) are encouraged in the comments section. User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral

Mario (talk | contribs | logs) for Bureaucrat Edited the wiki 3,498 times.

Result: Successful --Jake 19:30, June 7, 2015 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by a bureaucrat after seven days.

Nomination: Mario (talk | contribs | logs) has been a very active and experienced editor. In addition to their great content contributions and insightful ideas over the last few months, they've shown to have the right attitude and be helpful towards any new editors. I'd like to nominate Mario to be promoted from Admin to Bureaucrat, a position which only has one semi-active editor, and a position I'm confident will provide Mario with tools that'll be put to good use. ~SuperHamster Talk 17:09, June 1, 2015 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here. That's great! I'll be more than happy to use these tools. Thanks! ™ 18:44, June 1, 2015 (EDT) Mario is a brilliant editor who is one of the more active administrators on this site. A promotion to Bureaucrat is overdue. Red (talk) 11:24, June 2, 2015 (EDT) Mario is more than qualified for the Bureaucrat position. You've done a great job of being consistently active and have contributed a great deal to the wiki. Bravo! (talk) 16:56, June 2, 2015 (EDT) I've just recently returned to editing on this wiki after a long absence, but I've been viewing all the great work that Mario has done on this wiki. He has done well in his revival of Project Furniture, and he is very responsive to and open to communication with both new and old users. I believe he will make good use of his bureaucrat tools. --Wookiee123 (talk) 22:48, June 2, 2015 (EDT) You're such a cool admin! I think if you become a bureaurcrat, you'd be more awesome!--50.136.149.237 12:45, June 3, 2015 (EDT) You spend WAY too much time here, I always have to yell at you in order to get your attention. That being said, you do spend a lot of good time here and I think you deserve it. -Baby Luigi(Talk to me?) 18:15, June 3, 2015 (EDT)

Staff Votes Each staff member may vote with Neutral, Weak Support, Support, Strong Support, Weak Oppose, Oppose, or Strong Oppose. Comments (especially for opposition) are encouraged in the comments section. User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral

May

SuperCofee (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller or Higher Edited the wiki 14 times.

Result: Unsuccessful (nominee needs more edits; please gain more experience with constructive contributions before applying) ~SuperHamster Talk 20:24, May 10, 2015 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by a bureaucrat after seven days.

Nomination: Being a user is nice and everything but,its too limited. i mean,bigger capacibilities mean better edits right?ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴘᴀᴛʀᴏʟʟᴇʀ ᴏʀ ʜɪɢʜᴇʀ ɪ ᴍᴇᴀɴ ʏᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ɢᴇᴛ ᴍᴇ ᴅɪʀᴇᴄᴛʟʏ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴀᴅᴍɪɴɪsᴛʀᴀᴛᴏʀ ɪғ ʏᴏᴜ ɢᴜʏs ғᴇᴇʟ ʟɪᴋᴇ ɪᴛ SᴜᴘᴇʀCᴏғᴇᴇ(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 14:16, May 10, 2015 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here. Let's be frank: you don't have the experience nor the knowledge to be a patroller. The only tools you get are deletion, being able to edit a few protected pages (which are protected for a reason), marking edits as patrolled, deleting pages and images, and rollback. Normal users can already contribute significantly; the vast majority of my edits, for instance, can be done with any other user. I suspect the reason it's so limited for you is that you're yet to be autoconfirmed. Better edits come from experience, not from promotions, and to free yourself from limits, you have to earn the extra little freedom. It's all a matter of trust and dependability. Again, though, promotions aren't that much anyway (in paper at least; in practice, people tend to look up to you more). Anyhow, I support a quick veto because I'm confident that this nomination won't go anywhere. ™ 15:49, May 10, 2015 (EDT) But..yeah,i can do a lotta stuff. but i want promotion for if i accidentally create a page and i cant get rid of it.AND YES I AM AUTOCONFIRMED I JOINED APRIL 30 2015SᴜᴘᴇʀCᴏғᴇᴇ(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 16:01, May 10, 2015 (EDT) If that happens, you need to tag a page with {{delete}} and wait for a staff member to delete it. Not hard. If everyone had delete tools, it would be more of a hassle to clean up after vandalism and images, which are more difficult to restore, would get deleted as well. Hence why nonpromoted users have to request deletion. ™ 16:04, May 10, 2015 (EDT) But if its night time and everyone is asleep? SᴜᴘᴇʀCᴏғᴇᴇ(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 17:02, May 10, 2015 (EDT) Then the article waits. And we check recent changes since there usually aren't a lot of edits. If not, we check here. But users are active across several time zones so that means it might be night here, but late afternoon over there. ™ 18:30, May 10, 2015 (EDT) You have very few, if any, constructive edits SuperCofee. If you're serious about moving up to a Patroller/Admin position I think we need to see some more maturity & substantive edits first. (talk) 18:36, May 10, 2015 (EDT)

Staff Votes Each staff member may vote with Neutral, Weak Support, Support, Strong Support, Weak Oppose, Oppose, or Strong Oppose. Comments (especially for opposition) are encouraged in the comments section. User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral

January

Red Snapper (talk | contribs | logs) for Administrator Edited the wiki 0 times.

Result: Successful ~SuperHamster Talk 05:51, January 18, 2015 (EST) Consensus will be determined by a bureaucrat after seven days.

Nomination: Right, after thinking this over this week I've decided I'm ready to post this. After being promoted to Patroller a while back, I've continued to be an active editor with page expansions and such, and over the past few months I have made a few suggestions, joined our furniture project and followed policy pretty well. Honestly, sometimes I feel like I'm one the only staff members checking up on this place (xD) so if I'm promoted again I'd to willing to take on any administrative duties, patrol and defend the site, and do some things that one of the MediaWiki upgrades stopped me from doing (like updating Main Page/DLC). Thanks for your time, fellow staff members. Drago (talk) 13:43, January 9, 2015 (EST)

Comments Any editor may provide input here. Could someone please create the relevant template to allow Sunmarsh's vote box to appear? Otherwise he will be unable to vote in the nomination! :> Drago (talk) 13:43, January 9, 2015 (EST) We do need a more active administration team, and at the moment I can think of no one more qualified than Red Snapper for the job. --Jake 11:16, January 10, 2015 (EST) I don't see any problems with a red fish being an admin. Just as long as he's tasty. ;) ™ 18:22, January 11, 2015 (EST) Sorry, I'm a bit late to the party, but I definitely think Red Snapper aka Swedish Fish has shown that he's more than capable for the position of administrator. His application has my full support. --XXSuperXXNintendoXx (talk) 23:28, January 17, 2015 (EST)

Staff Votes Each staff member may vote with Neutral, Weak Support, Support, Strong Support, Weak Oppose, Oppose, or Strong Oppose. Comments (especially for opposition) are encouraged in the comments section. User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral

2014

August

Sunmarsh (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller Edited the wiki 24,481 times.

Result: Successful --Jake 14:00, August 7, 2014 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by a bureaucrat after seven days.

Nomination: Sunmarsh has only been here for a bit, but has done some major contributions both on the wiki and the forums. We've all seen the excellent work Sunmarsh has done - no doubt Sun will find staff tools useful and be able to use them responsibly. ~SuperHamster Talk 15:39, July 31, 2014 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here. Has gone above and beyond the requirements to receive a nomination. --XXSuperXXNintendoXx (talk) 15:41, July 31, 2014 (EDT) Great, wonderful editor. Opens up meaningful discussions and makes great contributions. Sunmarsh should be able to handle a few more tools! ™ 18:28, July 31, 2014 (EDT) Has gone beyond the call of duty to expand our articles, and is active on the forums as well. We are also still lacking in Patrollers, and Sunmarsh is certainly trustworthy enough for the tools. Definite support from me. Red Snapper 05:59, August 1, 2014 (EDT) I know sunmarsh from my time on ACC, and he has made great contributions both there and here on Nookipedia. I think he'd be a great addition to our team. --Jake 13:06, August 4, 2014 (EDT)

Staff Votes Each staff member may vote with Neutral, Weak Support, Support, Strong Support, Weak Oppose, Oppose, or Strong Oppose. Comments (especially for opposition) are encouraged in the comments section. User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral

April

Red Snapper (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller Edited the wiki 0 times.

Result: Successful -Sky (talk) 13:38, April 24, 2014 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by a bureaucrat after seven days.

Nomination: I am a productive editor here and now willing to take on the Patroller position. I have created a bunch of pages here, expanded others and took part in a couple of discussions. I'm also a Bulletin Board member now, so you can get in contact with me even if my Nookipedia e-mail confirmation is playing up. We only have ONE patroller at the moment, too (and no active ones) so having another user to mark edits as patrolled cannot hurt. Thanks! Red Snapper 15:15, April 17, 2014 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here. I do agree that we have a little amount of patrollers in this wiki, and it will be highly appreciated if we have one more. Red Snapper is a great, trustworthy user with a decent amount of edits. Being a patroller isn't a labor-intensive job, even though it's more than just marking edits as patrolled(!), and I think Red Snapper is up to the job. If this application succeeds, you'll be a welcome member to the team. MarioTalk to-a me! 15:14, April 18, 2014 (EDT) *

Staff Votes Each staff member may vote with Neutral, Weak Support, Support, Strong Support, Weak Oppose, Oppose, or Strong Oppose. Comments (especially for opposition) are encouraged in the comments section. User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral

Red Snapper (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller Edited the wiki 0 times.

Result: Withdrawn by candidate Consensus will be determined by a bureaucrat after seven days.

Nomination: I am a very active contributor here and have created and expanded a number of articles. Furthermore, I do patrol the recent changes regularly and will be able to revert vandalism when no other admins are online. To add to that, there are no other active Patrollers currently. I have a little experience (see here [1]) on another NIWA wiki too (although I since lost the password to that account). Thank you. Red Snapper 13:56, April 5, 2014 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here. I am withdrawing this application for personal reasons; and I feel I just want to be a contributor and not staff. And my confirmation e-mail for Nookipedia is taking its time too... See you around. Red Snapper 12:37, April 7, 2014 (EDT)

Staff Votes Each staff member may vote with Neutral, Weak Support, Support, Strong Support, Weak Oppose, Oppose, or Strong Oppose. Comments (especially for opposition) are encouraged in the comments section. User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral

2013

December

Mario (talk | contribs | logs) for Administrator Edited the wiki 3,498 times.

Result: Successful ~SuperHamster Talk 01:33, December 26, 2013 (EST) Consensus will be determined by a bureaucrat after seven days.

Nomination: Mario is a great, active editor - definitely has shown to be experienced and ready for the new toolset. ~SuperHamster Talk 16:34, December 19, 2013 (EST)

Comments Any editor may provide input here. This is a great gift from none other than Christmas! Thanks, guys! MarioTalk to-a me! 22:30, December 25, 2013 (EST)

Staff Votes Each staff member may vote with Neutral, Weak Support, Support, Strong Support, Weak Oppose, Oppose, or Strong Oppose. Comments (especially for opposition) are encouraged in the comments section. User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral

October

Mario (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller Edited the wiki 3,498 times.

Result: Successful --Jake 15:46, October 23, 2013 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by a bureaucrat after seven days.

Nomination: I've edited wikis (mainly MarioWiki, with 9,702 edits, 3,980 in the mainspace, 2,077 on files, and 1,249 on MarioWiki pages which includes voting on featured articles and proposals) for three years and I've shown this experience by the number and quality of my edits. I've also been on this wiki nearly every day for more than a few months now, since September 5, 2013. Although the template says I have edited 764 times at the moment of this writing, my edit count is actually 1,135 when you factor the other 30% of file uploads and others. I've also created two help pages. I also created wanted pages, organized a few personality pages, brought up many suggestions and questions, and minor things like grammar, removing unnecessary stubs, adding templates. I review other user's edits frequently. I'm not listing everything I've done so far, but here is my contributions. I'm an experienced user who will be glad with having some more tools to work with. Plus, there is only one active patroller at this moment, Grekox, so having another patroller won't hurt. MarioTalk to-a me! 17:59, October 17, 2013 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here. Has shown great edits for the past month and really has a mature mannerism about him. From what I have seen, I think he would be great to have on the team. -mlnintendo97 20:56, October 17, 2013 (EDT) He has spent a good amount of time online over the last two months, even if he isn't online every day. Given his experience and our need for patrollers, I'm in support of this promotion.--Jake 22:23, October 18, 2013 (EDT) Fantastic contributions - definitely ready for the tools :) - unsigned comment from SuperHamster (talk • contribs) We definitely need another active patroller due to the current influx of edits and due to the fact that its the school year which prevents some of us from contributing as much as we should or would like to. Additionally, he's shown great work with his contribution to the wiki and I feel like he's ready for the tools.--XXSuperXXNintendoXx (talk) 23:44, October 20, 2013 (EDT) Thanks for getting temporarily out of your busy days to vote, guys! MarioTalk to-a me! 13:27, October 21, 2013 (EDT)

Staff Votes Each staff member may vote with Neutral, Weak Support, Support, Strong Support, Weak Oppose, Oppose, or Strong Oppose. Comments (especially for opposition) are encouraged in the comments section. User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral

July

Sky (talk | contribs | logs) for Bureaucrat Edited the wiki 713 times.

Result: Successful ~SuperHamster Talk 01:54, 31 July 2013 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by a bureaucrat after seven days.

Nomination: Sky has been a long-time editor since 2011, and in that time has shown to be a great and careful editor. No doubt that he is deserving of the tools to join our currently small Bureaucrat team. ~SuperHamster Talk 00:45, 23 July 2013 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here. Solid amount of edits, long-time editor, and great amount of knowledge/motivation. Super (duh...)Alpaca 16:54, 23 July 2013 (EDT) Sky is a great editor with a wealth of experience. He goes out of his way to improve templates and propose changes. I'm confident that he would be a great addition to the bureaucratic team here at Nookipedia. --Jake 21:51, 26 July 2013 (EDT)

Staff Votes Each staff member may vote with Neutral, Weak Support, Support, Strong Support, Weak Oppose, Oppose, or Strong Oppose. Comments (especially for opposition) are encouraged in the comments section. User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral User's vote:    Neutral

Imjon (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller Edited the wiki 288 times.

Result: Successful ~SuperHamster Talk 00:44, 23 July 2013 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by admin after seven days.

Nomination: Has done great work over the last few weeks, and shows experience (having both edited Nookipedia and other wikis). No doubt he'd make good use of the toolset. ~SuperHamster Talk 01:59, 17 July 2013 (EDT)

Staff Votes Please use {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, and {{Neutral}} to vote.  Support, per nomination. ~SuperHamster Talk 01:59, 17 July 2013 (EDT)  Support He shows experience as I have seen his edits on both here and StrategyWiki. Would be great on the team. -mlnintendo97 19:14, 22 July 2013 (EDT)  Support Yes, he is doing a great job and will definitely be a great patroller. (I must have forgotten to vote for a week...) Super (duh...)Alpaca 19:21, 22 July 2013 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here.

XXSuperXXNintendoXx (talk | contribs | logs) for Administrator Edited the wiki 0 times.

Result: Successful ~SuperHamster Talk 00:44, 23 July 2013 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by admin after seven days.

Nomination: I’ve been a patroller for Nookipedia for about a year, and have recently begun to increase my activity in regards to both editing and patrolling. I’ve edited and have created a number of pages, such as the Garden Center, and am currently working on updating each Villager’s Page with their New Leaf artwork. I’m experienced with other NIWA wikis as well, and have formed many friendships over the last 1 ½ years with others, particularly on Zelda Wiki as xXSuperXXNintendoXx, Bulbapedia, Super Mario Wiki, and Icaruspedia. I would love to assist Nookipedia as much as I can and that’s why I think I’m ready to take on the task as being Nookipedia’s newest Adminisrtator. Thank You. XXSuperXXNintendoXx 21:29, 13 July 2013 (EDT)

Staff Votes Please use {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, and {{Neutral}} to vote.  Support Has shown great improvement in terms of patrolling edits and activity. As working with him with patrolling, I feel he is ready for becoming an Administrator. -mlnintendo97 21:43, 13 July 2013 (EDT) Weak  Support - Great work in the last few months, and could definitely use the tools :) Edit count is a bit on the low side, but I'm sure you'll make good use of the tools. - unsigned comment from SuperHamster (talk • contribs)

Comments Any editor may provide input here.

Grekox (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller Edited the wiki 241 times.

Result: Successful ~SuperHamster Talk 01:56, 17 July 2013 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by admin after seven days.

Nomination: I've enjoyed the wiki a lot since I've joined and want to help out the most I can with the increasing amount of traffic on the site. Grekox 13:53, 11 July 2013 (EDT)

Staff Votes Please use {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, and {{Neutral}} to vote.  Support This is just too obvious for me to need to justify a support. Super (duh...)Alpaca 14:04, 11 July 2013 (EDT)  Support Great work in recent weeks, especially with the Roost Café. Definitely deserving of tools. ~SuperHamster Talk 14:09, 11 July 2013 (EDT)  Support Must I explain why I'm supporting? It's obvious, this guy does great at editing. -mlnintendo97 16:52, 16 July 2013 (EDT)  Support Good, active editor. Should be able to use the Patroller tools well. -Sky (talk) 17:08, 16 July 2013 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here.

Wookiee123 (talk | contribs | logs) for Administrator Edited the wiki 3,289 times.

Result: Successful ~SuperHamster Talk 07:07, 14 July 2013 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by admin after seven days.

Nomination: Relatively new, but has been a tremendous help to the wiki, major contributions including the foreign names template and finishing up the list of villagers I was too lazy busy to finish up myself. Along with experience in several other wikis, Wookiee's shown strong experience in both articles and media, along with communicating politely and professionally, asking questions when needed. We currently have a long list of Patrollers and only two Administrators, and Wookiee would make a good fit as an admin. ~SuperHamster Talk 02:24, 9 July 2013 (EDT)

Staff Votes Please use {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, and {{Neutral}} to vote.  Support ~SuperHamster Talk 02:24, 9 July 2013 (EDT)  Support Sounds like a good idea for a good editor! Super (duh...)Alpaca 14:04, 11 July 2013 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here.

June

Wookiee123 (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller Edited the wiki 3,289 times.

Result: Successful ~SuperHamster Talk 01:49, 21 June 2013 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by admin after seven days.

Nomination: Not the highest edit count, though has done heavy and constructive article work in the last few weeks; definitely shows the experience and ability to put the Patroller toolset to good use. ~SuperHamster Talk 02:53, 18 June 2013 (EDT)

Staff Votes Please use {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, and {{Neutral}} to vote.  Support, per nomination. ~SuperHamster Talk 02:53, 18 June 2013 (EDT)  Support Has done great with image adding and article creation for GameCube houses and New Leaf characters, respectively. Ready to be given patroller status. Super (duh...)Alpaca 03:02, 18 June 2013 (EDT)  Support He seems like a great editor, and he's already spent a good amount of time online this month. We definitely need more patrollers, and he has my full support. --Jake 12:17, 18 June 2013 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here.

May

Dorsal Axe (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller Edited the wiki 2,016 times.

Result: Successful ~SuperHamster Talk 12:38, 11 May 2013 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by admin after seven days.

Nomination: Great article work and shows experience, definitely ready for Patroller tools. ~SuperHamster Talk 12:46, 7 May 2013 (EDT)
Staff Votes Please use {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, and {{Neutral}} to vote.  Support, per nomination. ~SuperHamster Talk 12:46, 7 May 2013 (EDT)	Comments Any editor may provide input here.

April

Mlnintendo97 (talk | contribs | logs) for Administrator Edited the wiki 284 times.

Result: Successful ~SuperHamster Talk 00:17, 26 April 2013 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by admin after seven days.

Nomination: Currently a Patroller, edited 820 times as of this edit, Active on the forums, and willing to welcome and help out new members of both the wiki and forum. -mlnintendo97 00:09, 19 April 2013 (EDT)

Staff Votes Please use {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, and {{Neutral}} to vote.  Support - Has gained and shown much experience in the past few months, along with making an excellent patroller and communicator; I'm confident that the admin tools will be put to good use. As a suggestion, something to focus on in the upcoming months is more content development. Cheers! ~SuperHamster Talk 01:11, 24 April 2013 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here.

avalonkp (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller Edited the wiki 0 times.

Result: Unsuccessful ~SuperHamster Talk 01:13, 22 April 2013 (EDT) Consensus will be determined by admin after seven days.

Nomination: Hello I am fairly active on the forum (The Bulletin Boards) and mostly post wanted pictures on the wiki but I am going to try to edit more. I would like to be a patroller (or anything in that case) thank you for your time and I hope I make it in. Thanks once again :) - unsigned comment from avalonkp (talk • contribs)

Staff Votes Please use {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, and {{Neutral}} to vote.  Oppose - Great work so far, but more experience and knowledge is definitely needed on different parts of the wiki before becoming a staff member (for starters, remember to sign all your messages and comments with ~~~~ =). Keep up the good work with pictures and articles, and it'd be great to re-consider you in a few months. ~SuperHamster Talk 00:02, 12 April 2013 (EDT)  Oppose - Great edits like SuperHamster said, but with more edits to pages and with some knowledge of wiki coding, I'd be happy to have you apart of the team! :) -mlnintendo97 13:11, 13 April 2013 (EDT)

Comments Any editor may provide input here. If you're looking for specific ways to gain more experience, some tips for things you can work on in the near future: you can add your uploaded pictures to various articles, along with adding content about Animal Crossing: New Leaf. ~SuperHamster Talk 00:06, 12 April 2013 (EDT)

March

XXSuperXXNintendoXx (talk | contribs | logs) for Administrator Edited the wiki 0 times.

Result: Unsuccessful (no consensus) ~SuperHamster Talk 01:55, 5 March 2013 (EST) Consensus will be determined by admin after seven days.

Nomination: He has been a great role model for the way I am suppose to patrol the wiki. I feel he is ready for being an Admin. :) -mlnintendo97 16:27, 20 December 2012 (EST) Admin Note: Nomination has been extended for an additional week to allow for consensus to be met. ~SuperHamster Talk 22:06, 28 December 2012 (EST)
Staff Votes Please use {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, and {{Neutral}} to vote.  Support See Nomination section -mlnintendo97  Oppose Definitely a great team member, but a nomination for adminship is a bit premature in my opinion. Given more time and experience, along with activity, and I'd be happy to support at a later time. ~SuperHamster Talk 22:06, 28 December 2012 (EST)	Comments Any editor may provide input here.

2012

November

Pakkun Pakkun (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller (/+) I'm one of the patrollers at Zelda Wiki and I'd like to support this wiki and perhaps provide some obligational relief by serving as staff. I haven't been here long, but I have no issue finding my way through a wiki or finding what could use some improvement. You're welcome to review my contributions at Zelda Wiki if it helps. Pakkun 07:04, 26 November 2012 (EST)

Comments I'll be happy to support before the end of the app's duration once I see a little bit of activity throughout the week (even just a few edits), just to ensure activity. I have no doubt you'd be a great staff member, and even though I see a great editor at ZeldaWiki, I'm uneasy with giving someone a staff position here when they have 0 edits to Nookipedia, for the sake of fairness. In my mind, work on another wiki can definitely be a factor to become a staff member, but can't be the primary and only justification. Conspiracy: SuperHamster's clever ploy of getting more edits to the wiki. ~SuperHamster Talk 20:14, 26 November 2012 (EST) Staff Votes Please use {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, and {{Neutral}} to vote. Strong  Support- I know Pakkun just joined yesterday, but I've known him for over year as a fellow editior on ZW, where he is known as an active and reliable patroller. He knows how to give constructive criticism, and I've seen this trait in about the 800 edits of mine that he has patrolled throughout my time on ZW. He would get my support for patroller on any wiki. --XXSuperXXNintendoXx 18:39, 26 November 2012 (EST)  Support - Already making plenty of great contributions, and clearly knowledgeable on editing. Would be great on the team :) ~SuperHamster Talk 16:35, 28 November 2012 (EST)  Support Looked at his edits on Zelda Wiki. (Great edits by the way!) I would be glad to have him on the team. :D -mlnintendo97 17:07, 28 November 2012 (EST)  Support Given the edits he's made here as well as those on ZeldaWiki, I also feel that he'd be a great addition to our team. --Jake 22:25, 28 November 2012 (EST)  Support We're always looking for new editors, especially from NIWA, judging by the amount of edits on ZeldaWiki, I really want him on the team. Leem01 01:49, 30 November 2012 (EST)

Result Consensus will be determined by admin after seven days. Promoted to Patroller ~SuperHamster Talk 23:14, 4 December 2012 (EST)

Odehgirlz Odehgirlz (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller I check back often and love editing. I always review everything I post and look for new things to add on stubs and wikis under construction. Odehgirlz 18:10, 22 November 2012‎ (EST)

Comments None Staff Votes Please use {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, and {{Neutral}} to vote. Strong Oppose: Seeing as she used a sockpuppet to give herself votes... -mlnintendo97 (talk) 19:01, 26 November 2012 (EST)  Oppose, per mlnintendo - great edits so far, but sockpuppetry is a blemish. Wrongs on a wiki can always be fixed over time, however :) ~SuperHamster Talk 20:17, 26 November 2012 (EST)

Result Consensus will be determined by admin after seven days. Unsuccessful ~SuperHamster Talk 18:42, 29 November 2012 (EST)

Mlnintendo97 Mlnintendo97 (talk | contribs | logs) for Patroller Edited the wiki about 50 times or more, Active member of The Bulletin Board -mlnintendo97 (talk) 22:55, 17 November 2012

Comments None Staff Votes Please use {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, and {{Neutral}} to vote. Weak  Support - mlnintendo's a great editor, but still could use more experience and needs to keep a cool head (i.e. reaction to new signature policy on the Bulletin Board). Taking that to heart, being a Patroller would be fine by me. Would wait a while before another promotion, however. ~SuperHamster Talk 19:53, 21 November 2012 (EST) Weak  Support - Agreed. I feel that mlnintendo has great potential. A patroller position along with some training could prepare him for future promotions with more responsibility. --Jake 14:11, 22 November 2012 (EST)

Result Consensus will be determined by admin after seven days. Promoted to Patroller ~SuperHamster Talk 00:26, 26 November 2012 (EST)